Xem giúp mình vớiGranted, there is a sizable difference between folk audirnce on the one hand, and academic specialists on the other, responding to a given theme. Whereas taletellers come to terms with tales in terms of more tales (which is how new variants crop up), academics engage tales in analytic terms by means of metanarrative discourses (which is how interpretive models arise). But in a realm of narrative transformations, such distinction is only ralative. In a review C.L. Strauss wrote... Xem giúp mình vớiGranted, there is a sizable difference between folk audirnce on the one hand, and academic specialists on the other, responding to a given theme. Whereas taletellers come to terms with tales in terms of more tales (which is how new variants crop up), academics engage tales in analytic terms by means of metanarrative discourses (which is how interpretive models arise). But in a realm of narrative transformations, such distinction is only ralative. In a review C.L. Strauss wrote for Diogène in 1954, he mentions the “very dangerous game” the mythologist (or folklorist) plays by placing one’s intellectual mechanisms in the service of any given narrative scheme, thus allowing it to live on and to operate that same mysterious “alchemy” that afforded it solidity and endurance troughout continents and millenaries. Gỉa dụ, đó là một sự khác biệt khá lớn giữa một bên là khán giả dân gian, và một bên là các chuyên gia khoa học , trong việc tiếp cận một chủ đề nhất định. (…Whereas taletellers come to terms with tales in terms of more tales (which is how new variants crop up), academics engage tales in analytic terms by means of metanarrative discourses (which is how interpretive models arise). But in a realm of narrative transformations, such distinction is only ralative. …..) Trong một bài đánh giá CL Strauss đã viết cho Diogène vào năm 1954, ông đề cập đến “1 trò chơi rất nguy hiểm” mà nhà nghiên cứu thần thoại học(hoặc nhà nghiên cứu VHDG) biểu diễn bằng cách đặt cơ chế sở hữu trí tuệ vào (…mechanisms in the service of any given narrative scheme,.. .), theo đó cho phép nó sản sinh và hoạt động cùng với "nhà giả kim" bí ẩn đó mang lại cho nó sự vững chắc và sự bền bỉ qua không gian và thời gian
Xem thêm.
09/04/17 08:55:22Xem giúp mình vớiGranted, there is a sizable difference between folk audirnce on the one hand, and academic specialists on the other, responding to a given theme. Whereas taletellers come to terms with tales in terms of more tales (which is how new variants crop up), academics engage tales in analytic terms by means of metanarrative discourses (which is how interpretive models arise). But in a realm of narrative transformations, such distinction is only ralative. In a review C.L. Strauss wrote... Xem thêm.Xem thêm 11 bình luận
0 · 09/04/17 11:02:44
0 · 10/04/17 08:34:02
